<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ITV Play!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/</link>
	<description>devoid of meaningful content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:48:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S</title>
		<link>http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>James S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 21:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannett.net/archives/44/itv-play#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helena</title>
		<link>http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Helena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannett.net/archives/44/itv-play#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>Alas, it would appear that he is already otherwise engaged. http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/interviews/article.html?in_article_id=46510&amp;in_page_id=11 Though the use of the term &quot;other half&quot; does strike me as slightly sexually ambiguous. Either way, it appears I shall have to lower my ambitions. Shame. Just think of all the miniBens, dancing around in their mini polyester Primark-castoffs... we could race them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, it would appear that he is already otherwise engaged. <a href="http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/interviews/article.html?in_article_id=46510&amp;in_page_id=11" rel="nofollow">http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/interviews/article.html?in_article_id=46510&amp;in_page_id=11</a> Though the use of the term &#8220;other half&#8221; does strike me as slightly sexually ambiguous. Either way, it appears I shall have to lower my ambitions. Shame. Just think of all the miniBens, dancing around in their mini polyester Primark-castoffs&#8230; we could race them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannett.net/archives/44/itv-play#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Ben Baldwin&#039;s children? Now there&#039;s a disturbing thought. Never speak of it again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Baldwin&#8217;s children? Now there&#8217;s a disturbing thought. Never speak of it again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helena</title>
		<link>http://hannett.net/2007/04/itv-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>Helena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannett.net/archives/44/itv-play#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Oh god. The inanity. I cannot believe I didn&#039;t stay to watch this, it sounds fantastically preferable to my rational choice of sleep. Still, your commentary makes the pain almost bearable. 
I love Ben, I love his dance, I love his &quot;winklepickers&quot;... I even love his worryingly autonomous eyebrows. But on reflection, I probably wouldn&#039;t have his children - I don&#039;t think that the human genepool is sufficiently well-equipped as of yet to cope with the madness. Not when it already has to contend with insomniac grannies who&#039;ll call up simply to utter the words &quot;blue balls&quot; on national television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god. The inanity. I cannot believe I didn&#8217;t stay to watch this, it sounds fantastically preferable to my rational choice of sleep. Still, your commentary makes the pain almost bearable.<br />
I love Ben, I love his dance, I love his &#8220;winklepickers&#8221;&#8230; I even love his worryingly autonomous eyebrows. But on reflection, I probably wouldn&#8217;t have his children &#8211; I don&#8217;t think that the human genepool is sufficiently well-equipped as of yet to cope with the madness. Not when it already has to contend with insomniac grannies who&#8217;ll call up simply to utter the words &#8220;blue balls&#8221; on national television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
